This page contains reference information broadly related to computers, networking and the Internet


SCSI versus IDE Hard Disks - Which One Should You Buy?

 

RAID Hard Disk Arrays: They Work, They're Affordable, Every Network should have one - Including Yours!

 

How to Choose the Right Networking Cable

 

A List of  the 2-letter Country Internet domain abbreviations.

 


Other Related pages  on this Website:-

Technical Information Index

 

My Notebook

 

Home Page


SCSI versus IDE Hard Disks - Which One Should You Buy?
SCSI hard drives systems cost four times more than IDE systems of the same capacity.

It's so tempting to say "IDE will be OK" but how do you make the right choice?

Some Definitions:-

IDE

Integrated Drive Electronics Before IDE, disk drives were simpler, mostly mechanical devices that were controlled by logic cards that plugged into motherboard slots

EIDE

Extended Integrated Drive Electronics Starting in 1994, this extended the speed and capacity of the original IDE standard. The term EIDE covers the standards ATA-2 to ATA-7

ATA

AT Attachment

(AT comes from the 1984 IBM PC/AT and stands for Advanced Technology)

Also called ATA-1 this is the official name of the standard known popularly known as IDE

ATAPI

ATA Packet Interface This is the name of the CD-ROM and Tape Drive interface that shares the same cable as an IDE disk drive

SATA

Serial ATA The new IDE standard which uses a thin cable and can transfer data at 150mbps

SCSI

Small Computer System Interface Defined in 1986, this is the other type of hard disk interface

I use the term IDE to mean all variations of the ATA standard.

 

The Advantages of SCSI

Modern IDE drives are fast, but SCSI drives are faster. Here are some advantages of SCSI over IDE:-
All device on the SCSI bus can be active simultaneously. With multiple SCSI hard drives on the same bus, although only one device at a time can be transferring data, the others can be moving their heads into position and preparing data for transfer.

Only one device at a time can be active on an IDE cable bus.

Mainstream SCSI drives spin at 15,000 rpm while IDE drives spin at 7,500 rpm. A high spindle speed means faster access.
There can be 6 devices on a SCSI bus while and IDE bus can only have 2. A computer often contains 2  x SCSI buses.

It's unusual for a computer to have more than 4 x IDE buses and, because of the requirement to have a CD-ROM drive and not wanting to put 2 drives on a single cable, computers rarely have more than 4 x IDE drives.

In my experience, hot-swapping works better with SCSI than IDE. Windows certainly doesn't like drives appearing and disappearing but the hardware RAID controller should be able to hide this.
A lot of high-end equipment such as RAID controllers and backup devices only come with SCSI interfaces.

Firewire and USB now offers more attractive alternatives for devices, such as scanners, that used to use SCSI.

A RAID 5 hot-swap 15,000rpm SCSI disk array is the best way to get a fast, fault-tolerant hard disk system for and this is probably the biggest difference between an entry-level small business server and a high-end server.

 

A Guide to Making Your Choice:-

Type Of Server

IDE

SCSI

Domain Controller with 20 or less users  
Domain Controller with 50 or less users with no

disk-intensive server application such as a database

 
Domain Controller with more than 20 users and

a disk-intensive server application

 
Domain Controller with more than 50 users  
Web Server with up to 500 users  
Mail Server with up to 200 users (less if using Exchange)  
Terminal Services Server  
SQL Server  
You can run Windows 2000's Performance Monitor and view the disk performance counters to determine how well your disk drives are coping but this is usually only possible after you've already made your decision and bought the drives. Hopefully it will confirm you've done the right thing.

 

Mix and Match

Maybe your company needs a total of 200 gigabytes of hard disk storage but only 30 gigabytes needs to be the fast-access type for your database.

In this case it could be cheaper to have 2 x 200gbyte IDE drives in a 200gbytes RAID 1 array and 3 x 18gb SCSI drives in a 36 gigabyte RAID 5 array.

With all hard disk specifications you should consider how fast your company's data storage requirements are growing and how easy it's going to be to increase your disk drive capacity when the time comes.

 

What's iSCSI?

Internet Small Computer Systems Interface is an interface standard that converts normal SCSI bus traffic to a serial data stream which is then encapsulated into TCP/IP frames for sending over the Internet. iSCSI is supported by Windows Server 2003 but what possible use could it be?

Storage Area Networks are used by large organisations as a central repository of all their data which is usually only accessed by servers and is an alternative to storing it on drives directly attached to servers. Geographically separate offices can be on the same SAN and be accessing data over large distances. Super-fast Fibre Channel connections are normally used to connect servers to SAN storage devices but the maximum distance that this operates over is 120kms, iSCSI can extend the range of SANs to wherever the Internet reaches. It offers a cheaper alternative to Fibre Channel but can't operate at the same speed.

It obviously makes sense to some people to have the data you want to access stored on a hard drive 1000s of miles away.

Back to the top of the page

 

 

RAID Hard Disk Arrays: They Work, They're Affordable, Every Network should have one - Including Yours!
In 1987 professors Gibson, Katz and Patterson at the University of California published the first paper describing a Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID). Their research was sponsored by IBM who hold many patents on RAID and who were the first to produce a commercial RAID product in 1990.
RAID is a great example of lateral thinking: instead of solving a difficult technical problem you find a way to make it far less important. This problem was that computer hard drives are delicate mechanical devices which, when in use, operate at a high stress level subjecting them to constant wear and tear and yet these same drives are used to store precious data as well as an operating system setup which is time consuming to restore. The ever-present prospect of a hard disk failure limited the degree of trust that could be placed in computers. RAID has developed many variations and options but the essential characteristics of RAID are:-
   
The "I" in RAID originally stood for "Inexpensive" until the RAID Advisory Board decided that "Independent" was more appropriate.
1 - 2 or more hard disks are linked together in a RAID Array which the operating system sees as a single drive.
2 - If one of the individual hard disks fails the RAID array continues to operate normally as far as the host computer is concerned.
3 - When the failed hard disk is replaced with a new one, this disk is automatically rebuilt so that fault tolerance is re-established.
The method in which disks are combined in a RAID array is referred to as the RAID Level which is usually a number between 0 and 10. Some RAID levels aren't used anymore and were just a step along RAID's evolutionary road. For example the improvements of RAID 5 over RAID 4 means RAID 4 is obsolete.
The following table summarises the types of RAID levels in common use today:-

RAID Level

Description

Advantages

Drawbacks

0 Striping Fastest. Consecutive data is spread across different drives and there's no Parity to worry about No Redundancy so not strictly RAID. All data is lost if any disk fails so less reliable than a single drive
1

 

Mirroring Safe and Simple. Each drive contains an exact copy of the data on the other.

Read performance is improved.

The storage capacity of the array equals the size of the smallest disk in the array.
5 Data Striping with Distributed Parity High performance while still able to withstand a disk failure.

The majority of the total disk space is available for data storage.

Requires a minimum of 3 drives.

Read and write performance slows when a drive has failed.

6 Data Striping with 2 lots of distributed parity Any 2 of the drives can fail simultaneously without causing data loss! It requires a complex and expensive controller.
10 RAID 1 + 0
2 or more RAID 1 Mirrors are combined into a RAID 0 stripe set

Gives great performance while maintaining high fault-tolerance. Requires a minimum of 4 drives.
  Other RAID Levels you should know about
0 + 1 2 RAID 0 stripe sets are combined into a

RAID 1 mirror

Same performance level as RAID 10 Less fault-tolerant and longer rebuild times than RAID 10.

 

JBOD Just a Bunch Of Disks

(The RAID Advisory Board hasn't got around to changing this unflattering acronym.)

I can't think of anything good to say about it, buy a bigger disk instead No redundancy or striping. Smaller disks are just combined,  or spanned, to give one large capacity disk

 

What Happens when a Drive Fails?

This is when your RAID array is earning its money so the answer should be "Nothing, as far as the users are concerned". In reality the data transfer rate of the array drops - especially with RAID 5 where missing data on the failed drive now has to be regenerated, on the fly, from the parity information.

From a network management perspective swift action is now required as another drive failure will cause total data loss (unless you have RAID 6).

The risk is now greater than if you weren't using RAID because:-

1 - If 2 or more disks are still functioning in the array there's now a greater overall chance that one will fail.
2 - The same type of hard drives, purchased at the same time and subject to the same operating conditions have an uncanny habit of failing within a few months of each other.

 

RAID Features that Help Restore Redundancy after a Disk Failure

Alerts
If RAID works the way it should, a failed drive could well go unnoticed. A RAID system, therefore, usually has a monitoring system that detects a disk failure and tries to attract attention by:-
Making the computer beep.
Sending out network alerts.
Writing to the Event Log
Sending emails to administrators.
Hot Swap Drives

It can be a real problem finding an opportunity to shutdown a busy server in order to replace a hard drive. RAID systems often allow an individual drive to be removed and replaced while the power is on - a process called hot swapping. Hot swapping uses a high quality connector system where the earth pins make contact first and break contact last as well as a RAID controller that is prepared for drives that appear and disappear without warning.

Hot Spares

A Hot Spare is a drive plugged into a RAID array that's not doing anything. It's on the "substitute's bench" ready to take over automatically if one of the active drives fails.

A Cold Spare, on the other hand, is a spare drive locked away in a cupboard somewhere.

Replacement Drive Policy

This is something that a Networking Department has and not a RAID feature.

Whether you've got hot or cold spares for your RAID array you should have worked out in advance what action you'll take when a drive fails so as to keep up the full protection offered by your RAID system. This isn't as simple as "when one drive fails we'll just buy another". Hard drives have been undergoing rapid development in the last few years leading to increased performance and capacity and so particular models often only stay current for a few months. Trying to find the same model drive as one bought 2 years ago is often impossible and RAID does function best when all the drives are the same model.

A sensible policy might be to buy 2 extra drives as cold spares when the RAID array is bought new and when the last of these has been put into service plan to replace all the drives, including cold spares, with a current hard drive model sometime soon.

 

What about Software RAID?

Software RAID means the operating system handles the RAID controller functions in software - you still have to buy all the physical drives.

I'd give Windows 2000 Server's implementation of software RAID 10 out of 10 for effort but I would never recommend anyone to use it because:-

It was designed to save you the expense of  hardware RAID controller cards. These are now cheaper and often built into the motherboard.
It can be difficult to boot from a software RAID array, especially if a drive has failed.
Every engineering bone in my body tells me the best approach is to use dedicated hardware for the RAID controller and leave the operating system out of the picture.

 

SCSI RAID or IDE RAID?

From 1990 to 1997 only SCSI RAID existed. RAID was elitist, high-end and provided a good profit margin for its suppliers. There's no technical reason why SCSI drives are more suited to RAID than IDE drives and so Promise took RAID "down-market" when it was one of the first to develop an IDE RAID controller. Eventually Adaptec, a name with strong links to SCSI, released IDE RAID cards and today they are commonplace and a feature often incorporated into motherboards.

"SCSI RAID or IDE RAID?" is the wrong question. "I need RAID, of course, but do I need SCSI or IDE drives?" is what you should be asking.

There's a discussion on this here - find out and get back to me.

 

What's the best way for a Small-to-Medium sized business to take advantage of RAID?

Here's a step-by-step guide to what, I think, is the easiest way into RAID
1 - Decide that you will implement RAID the next time you have a server upgrade. It may seem scary and a hassle but it's nothing compared to the trouble a failed server hard drive will cause you.  
2 - Choose SATA RAID Level 1 - Disk Mirroring.

NOT SCSI RAID, Serial ATA is a new enhancement of the IDE standard

3 - Decide how much data storage space your company needs now and predict what this will grow to in 5 years. If the figure you get is greater than 300Gbytes you'll have to separate out the unchanging data, such as past correspondence and archives, which doesn't need to be on RAID to leave just new and changing data. If you still have a requirement of  more than 300Gbytes then your needs are outside the scope of this article and you'll need a more high-end solution.  
4 - Buy 3 identical models of SATA hard drives with a minimum storage capacity of 160Gbytes (300Gbytes is the current maximum capacity of a single IDE drive).

That 3rd drive - the cold spare - is important  as we're going to do a nifty trick with it.

 
5 - Buy an Adaptec 2410SA Enclosure kit which is a combined SATA RAID controller card and hot-swap enclosure available from Misco for £333. It's got 4 hard drive slots but in this example we're only going to use 2 of them. You could use the 3rd and 4th slots for extra non-RAID data drives. It's a pity there aren't 5 slots as then you could have an additional RAID 5 data array.
6 - Start by installing the Adaptec RAID card and the Hot-Swap drive enclosure with no drives inserted but with all the power and data cables connected and install the drivers for the card and utility programs onto your original server hard drive. Then make a copy of your existing hard drive onto one of the new SATA drives. Do this by connecting a SATA drive as a secondary master or slave drive. If your current server doesn't handle SATA drives use an IDE-to-SATA converter cable. Use BootitNT, Ghost, Acronis or the server version of Partition Magic to copy the server disk image to the SATA drive.

It's likely that the new drive has a higher capacity that the original so use the same partition manipulation program to expand the partition so that it occupies the whole of the SATA disk.

7 - Fit the SATA drive into Slot 1 of the RAID enclosure, remove the original server drive - it's now officially retired - and boot from the SATA disk to check that everything works OK. Then fit a second SATA drive to a drive caddy and insert it into Slot 2. Use the Adaptec utility to join the 2 drives into a RAID 1 Mirror array and the process of building the second drive into a mirror of the first will start. It does this in the background as the server continues to operate as normal and takes around 2hrs for every 100 Gigabytes. When complete you'll have a fully functional RAID 1 array.
My Kind of Backup
We all know we have to make backups, but no one enjoys doing them.

Backing up the whole server every day is usually too hard and so the task is split into 2:-

1 - Make daily backups of new data or data that's changed.
2 - Make periodic backups of the operating systems and installed software.

 It might be appropriate to do this weekly, monthly or even 6-monthly, depending on how quickly such a backup goes out-of-date.

I can't help you with 1 but, with your Adaptec 2410SA now successfully installed, here's how to make a complete backup of the server hard drive:-
Slide the drive out of Slot 2, stick a Post-It note on it and write the date and the words  "Out Slot 2 in Slot1" and lock it away in a cupboard.  
The Mirror Crack'd

An Agatha Christie novel

Slide the Cold Spare into Slot 2.
Oh! Sorry, that was it, we've finished. Did I go too quickly? Let's do it again.
6 months later:-
Get the Cold Spare from the cupboard and read the Post-It note and see that it says "...in Slot 1".
Slide the drive out of Slot 1, stick a Post-It note on it and write the date and the words "Out Slot 1 in Slot 2" and lock it away in a cupboard.
Slide the Cold Spare into Slot 1.
This disk-rotation method ensures each drive has equal wear and if you're worried about RAID protection not being available during the, perhaps, 4 hours it take to rebuild the Cold Spare, remember that you have a very recent full backup locked away in the cupboard.
A Disaster Recovery Scenario
Someone who's performed their company's backup procedure hundreds of times may never have had to do a full system restore and, because of the inconvenience it would cause and the lack of spare equipment, they've never even practised a restore: another thing to worry about on the day your business is depending on it.

So you've been successfully taking advantage of the hot-swap and auto-rebuild abilities of your RAID system to make the easiest ever complete server backups and one day disaster strikes: a rogue patch planted by a hacker on the Windows Update site is downloaded and installed on your server which then trashes the system folder making the server unable to boot and the boss is looking to you to fix it. Here's the drill:-

Turn off the server and slide out the drives in Slot 1 and Slot 2.
Get the Cold Spare from the cupboard, slide it into Slot 1 and turn the server back on.
Restore yesterday's data backup then tell the boss we're up and running again.

(Oops, better disable Windows Update first.) If that took more than 15 minutes you must have been milking it for dramatic effect.

There are still some clean-up jobs to be done.

Slide one of the disks you pulled out into Slot 2 and wait for it to be rebuilt. During the hours this rebuild takes you have no backup in the case a second disaster. A good time, perhaps, to reflect on a 4-disk rotation scheme where a 2nd Cold Spare is stored off-site.

You could now also attach the 2nd scrambled drive to another PC and make a data backup in case there's been any important new data since yesterday.

Slide the drive out of Slot 2, stick a Post-It note on it and write the date and the words  "Out Slot 2 in Slot1" and lock it away in a cupboard.
Slide the remaining drive into Slot 2.
This split-mirror backup trick only works with RAID 1 and, because of the speed and ease with which a system can be restored, it beats the standard method of using a tape drive.

 


How to Choose the Right Networking Cable
CAT5, CAT5e, CAT5e Extended, CAT6, CAT7, 350mHz cable or optical fibre?
Shielded or Unshielded?
Solid Conductor or Stranded?
Cable Box or Reel?
What about just having a wireless network instead?

When you have to choose the type of cable to install for your office network, it's a decision you don't want to get wrong.
After the cable installation phase is complete, the furniture has been put back and any damage to the decor repaired it's bad enough finding that you've forgotten a few cable runs but it's a disaster if it turns out you've used inferior cable which will have to be replaced in 18 months time.
For a typical 20 user office network you'll probably need, at most, 1200 metres of cable. Buying this amount of premium grade cable will cost you around £500. You can pick up 1200m of cheaper cable for £250 or less but this could end up costing you dearly in the long run.
The network cable you install today should be capable of handling networking standards for at least the next 10 years. Without a crystal ball, this means looking at today's leading edge technologies and taking a guess at what will be the norm a decade's time.
Gigabit Ethernet over copper, denoted as 1000base-T and sometimes 802.3ab, is already finding its way into small-to-medium-sized network installations so any cable installed today should definitely be capable of 1000mbps over every cable run.
Most traffic on a LAN consists of communication between workstations and servers which means that, with many workstations typically talking to just a few servers, the network connections to servers are the most likely places to become bottlenecks. The speed of the server link can be increased by combining 2 switch ports, 2 cable runs and 2 server network cards to double the data rate but a better way is to operate the server runs at 10x the speed of the workstation links. Today this means workstations operating at 100mbps while servers operate at 1000mbps but if we're planning for all the workstations to operate at 1000mbps how can we cable for 10gbps links to the servers? Two ways:-

1 - Run multimode optical fibres between the servers and the network switch alongside the copper cable. The fibre's for future use so, for the moment, leave the ends unterminated. (Optical fibre has a far higher theoretical data rate than copper cable.)
2 - Locate the servers close to the network switch so that any future cabling will be a simple matter.
Remember that it's only the cable we're trying to future-proof, you don't have to go to Gigabit and beyond with the rest of the network equipment just yet. This equipment can be upgraded relatively easily when the time is right however, though not essential, I would also recommend getting outlet sockets, patchfields and patchcords that match the speed of your cable.

So back to the question of which cable to get.

Obsolete Cables
Thinnet and Thicknet - coaxial cables.
CAT3, CAT4 and CAT5. Yes, even CAT5 is on the scrapheap as it's not guaranteed to operate at 1000mbps especially over 100m runs.
CAT5 Variants
The CAT6 standard was only ratified in June 2002 so many cable manufacturers tried to anticipate this by producing their own improved versions of CAT5 which were intended for use with Gigabit Ethernet.
If you've installed CAT5e cable capable of data rates up to 350mHz then don't worry, you'll very likely be OK but, from now on, CAT6 cable is the one you should use.

Category 6 Networking Cable
Gigabit Ethernet requires the individual copper pairs to operate at 200mHz. Gigabit Ethernet uses all 4 pairs in a network cable - 2 for sending and 2 for receiving - and a 1000mbps signal can be multiplexed over 2 x 200mHz cables - it can, the mathematicians say so and it's no use arguing with them. So a typical CAT5e cable operating up to 350mHz is good for Gigabit and a little bit extra besides. What CAT6 cable does, in addition to raw bandwidth, is to reduce the interference, or crosstalk, between the four cable pairs by incorporating a piece of plastic running down the centre of the cable to hold the individual pairs apart. In tests this has been shown to reduce the amount of packet errors and retransmissions. The central plastic separator increases the diameter of CAT6 cable to 6mm from the 4mm of CAT5e - so remember to allow for this with the size of your conduits.

Surely CAT7 or Optical Fibre Cabling is more Future-Proof?

Indeed they would be. CAT7 is, so far, a theoretical standard for 600mHz per copper pair and I haven't seen any for sale yet. CAT7 will require a completely different connector system - forget RJ45 - and a meticulous installation methodology will be required to achieve the high data rates. I think it will too difficult to go much beyond 200mHz per pair and will prove easier to use fibre everywhere instead.

So why not install a wholly fibre-optic network now?

Because it's will cost between 3 and 5 times as much as a CAT6 network.

However, there are sometimes good reasons to have fibre runs in your current network :-

A network outlet is needed which is more than 200m from a network switch - optical fibre links can be up to 20kms long.
A cable run must pass through a hostile environment e.g. near heavy machinery generating electrical interference, or under water.
You have a once-only opportunity to lay cable after which recabling will be prohibitively expensive. Perhaps in a new factory or a heritage building.
Optical fibre is very hard to eavesdrop on and so is favoured in high security environments.

The Other Questions

Shielded or Unshielded?

Unshielded, the cable you want is called Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP).
Shielding means the 4 inner pairs are wrapped in metal foil before the outer plastic sheath is put on. Shielding absorbs electrical interference and so reduces its disruptive effect on the signals travelling within it. It also stops the signals in the cable itself leaking out and causing interference of their own which is useful when 2 or more network cables run alongside each other.
However the shield itself applies a capacitative load on the inner pairs which tends to attenuate high frequency signal components. Surprisingly, it's been established that, for Ethernet, unshielded cables perform better than shielded ones which is good news because unshielded cable is cheaper. You'll see Shielded Twisted Pair (STP) cable for sale because it's specified for use in other networking systems, such as Token Ring, but for Ethernet you definitely need the unshielded variety.

Solid Conductor or Stranded?

Solid.
Solid conductors have superior electrical characteristics compared to stranded but the solid copper core will break if subjected to too much movement. Stranded cable, where 6 or more thin, pliable strands of copper are woven together to form the core or the wire, can take a lot of flexing without breaking. So you should use solid conductor cable for premise wiring and stranded cable for patchcords.

Cable Box or Reel?

Reel.
A cable box is simply a cardboard box into which 300m of cable has been stuffed. You pull the cable out through a hole in one side and just keep pulling until it runs out. This is convenient but, unless you're very careful, the cable can get sharp kinks which, even though you straighten them out, subject the cable to undesirable rough handling. A reel of cable needs a dispensing mechanism to allow the reel to rotate without wandering all over the room as the cable is unwound. This can be as simple as a pole through the middle. I think that dispensing cable from a reel is the gentlest way of installing it and gives less twists than when it's pulled from a cable box.

A reel inside a box is now quite common and gets you the convenience of a box without the kinks.

Be Conscious of Fire Safety

Network cable comes with 2 types of plastic outer sheathing: the type that doesn't produce poisonous gas when burnt and the type that does. It's not mandatory to use the poisonous gas free variety in all situations but I think we should all show that we're safety conscious and pay the 30% extra that this cable costs. In the UK this cable is called LSZH (Low Smoke Zero Halogen) or another similar name and in the US is referred to as Plenum-Grade (the plenum is the space above a false ceiling).

So now at last we have the complete specification for our cable:-
We need to order a 500 metre reel of LSZH, solid conductor, CAT6 Unshielded Twisted Pair network cable - see if they have it in pink.

In the UK you can get some here.

External Grade Cable

If any cable runs will be exposed to the elements then you'll also need a smaller amount of the exterior grade version of this cable which resists the ingress of moisture and deterioration due to exposure to ultra-violet light.

Let's not bother with all this cable nonesense and have a wireless network instead.

There have been some recent improvements in wireless networking which have made it more attractive:-

The 802.11g standard has been ratified and this specifies a data rate of 56mbps in the 2.4gHz band.
The easy-to-crack WEP security standard has been superseded by the, hopefully, impossible-to-crack WPA security standard.
The 56mbps that 802.11g offers has to be shared between all devices using a particular access point while a device on a gigabit LAN has 1000mbps all to itself, which is a huge difference.
Although wireless networking is fantastic for roaming access, temporary or problem installations you can't beat the simplicity, performance and reliability of copper cable.




A List of  the 2-letter, Country Internet domain abbreviations.
AD   Andorra
AE   United Arab Emirates
AF   Afghanistan
AG   Antigua and Barbuda
AI   Anguilla
AL   Albania
AM   Armenia
AN   Netherlands Antilles
AO   Angola
AQ   Antarctica
AR   Argentina
AS   American Samoa
AT   Austria
AU   Australia
AW   Aruba
AZ   Azerbaijan
BA   Bosnia and Herzegovina
BB   Barbados
BD   Bangladesh
BE   Belgium
BF   Burkina Faso
BG   Bulgaria
BH   Bahrain
BI   Burundi
BJ   Benin
BM   Bermuda
BN   Brunei Darussalam
BO   Bolivia
BR   Brazil
BS   Bahamas
BT   Bhutan
BV   Bouvet Island
BW   Botswana
BY   Belarus
BZ   Belize
CA   Canada
CC   Cocos (Keeling) Islands
CF   Central African Republic
CG   Congo
CH   Switzerland
CI   Cote D'Ivoire (Ivory Coast)
CK   Cook Islands
CL   Chile
CM   Cameroon
CN   China
CO   Colombia
CR   Costa Rica
CS   Czechoslovakia (former)
CU   Cuba
CV   Cape Verde
CX   Christmas Island
CY   Cyprus
CZ   Czech Republic
DE   Germany
DJ   Djibouti
DK   Denmark
DM   Dominica
DO   Dominican Republic
DZ   Algeria
EC   Ecuador
EE   Estonia
EG   Egypt
EH   Western Sahara
ER   Eritrea
ES   Spain
ET   Ethiopia
FI   Finland
FJ   Fiji
FK   Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
FM   Micronesia
FO   Faroe Islands
FR   France
FX   France, Metropolitan
GA   Gabon
GB   Great Britain (UK)
GD   Grenada
GE   Georgia
GF   French Guiana
GH   Ghana
GI   Gibraltar
GL   Greenland
GM   Gambia
GN   Guinea
GP   Guadeloupe
GQ   Equatorial Guinea
GR   Greece
GS   S. Georgia and S. Sandwich Isls.
GT   Guatemala
GU   Guam
GW   Guinea-Bissau
GY   Guyana
HK   Hong Kong
HM   Heard and McDonald Islands
HN   Honduras
HR   Croatia (Hrvatska)
HT   Haiti
HU   Hungary
ID   Indonesia
IE   Ireland
IL   Israel
IN   India
IO   British Indian Ocean Territory
IQ   Iraq
IR   Iran
IS   Iceland
IT   Italy
JM   Jamaica
JO   Jordan
JP   Japan
KE   Kenya
KG   Kyrgyzstan
KH   Cambodia
KI   Kiribati
KM   Comoros
KN   Saint Kitts and Nevis
KP   Korea (North)
KR   Korea (South)
KW   Kuwait
KY   Cayman Islands
KZ   Kazakhstan
LA   Laos
LB   Lebanon
LC   Saint Lucia
LI   Liechtenstein
LK   Sri Lanka
LR   Liberia
LS   Lesotho
LT   Lithuania
LU   Luxembourg
LV   Latvia
LY   Libya
MA   Morocco
MC   Monaco
MD   Moldova
MG   Madagascar
MH   Marshall Islands
MK   Macedonia
ML   Mali
MM   Myanmar
MN   Mongolia
MO   Macau
MP   Northern Mariana Islands
MQ   Martinique
MR   Mauritania
MS   Montserrat
MT   Malta
MU   Mauritius
MV   Maldives
MW   Malawi
MX   Mexico
MY   Malaysia
MZ   Mozambique
NA   Namibia
NC   New Caledonia
NE   Niger
NF   Norfolk Island
NG   Nigeria
NI   Nicaragua
NL   Netherlands
NO   Norway
NP   Nepal
NR   Nauru
NT   Neutral Zone
NU   Niue
NZ   New Zealand (Aotearoa)
OM   Oman
PA   Panama
PE   Peru
PF   French Polynesia
PG   Papua New Guinea
PH   Philippines
PK   Pakistan
PL   Poland
PM   St. Pierre and Miquelon
PN   Pitcairn
PR   Puerto Rico
PT   Portugal
PW   Palau
PY   Paraguay
QA   Qatar
RE   Reunion
RO   Romania
RU   Russian Federation
RW   Rwanda
SA   Saudi Arabia
Sb   Solomon Islands
SC   Seychelles
SD   Sudan
SE   Sweden
SG   Singapore
SH   St. Helena
SI   Slovenia
SJ   Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
SK   Slovak Republic
SL   Sierra Leone
SM   San Marino
SN   Senegal
SO   Somalia
SR   Suriname
ST   Sao Tome and Principe
SU   USSR (former)
SV   El Salvador
SY   Syria
SZ   Swaziland
TC   Turks and Caicos Islands
TD   Chad
TF   French Southern Territories
TG   Togo
TH   Thailand
TJ   Tajikistan
TK   Tokelau
TM   Turkmenistan
TN   Tunisia
TO   Tonga
TP   East Timor
TR   Turkey
TT   Trinidad and Tobago
TV   Tuvalu
TW   Taiwan
TZ   Tanzania
UA   Ukraine
UG   Uganda
UK   United Kingdom
UM   US Minor Outlying Islands
US   United States
UY   Uruguay
UZ   Uzbekistan
VA   Vatican City State (Holy See)
VC   Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
VE   Venezuela
VG   Virgin Islands (British)
VI   Virgin Islands (U.S.)
VN   Viet Nam
VU   Vanuatu
WF   Wallis and Futuna Islands
WS   Samoa
YE   Yemen
YT   Mayotte
YU   Yugoslavia
ZA   South Africa
ZM   Zambia
ZR   Zaire (now called Democratic Republic of Congo)
ZW   Zimbabwe

COM    US Commercial
EDU    US Educational
GOV    US Government
INT    International
MIL    US Military
NET    Network
ORG    Non-Profit Organization
ARPA   Old style Arpanet
NATO   Nato field 
Back to the top of the page


Go back to the main page